No. 22-6960
James Jonathan Mitchell v. Florida
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: cruel-and-unusual-punishment death-penalty due-process eighth-amendment habeas-corpus mental-competency
Key Terms:
Arbitration
Arbitration
Latest Conference:
2023-05-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment prohibits the execution of a prisoner who is incompetent to understand the reason for his execution
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
ESTION PRESENTED: (Bees €vthee dae WOCCES Ff) SUM, tly. de 9, bale. _ CHrpus Lhiat2 lege! peal Coit’ fundamental Cttites and _| Sutfeen th cer LS OF Tnchtettie Assist ae of “pellafp . / 4 « a We, y — ay ates: LALA OF West aS tar) é erence cee ‘/ The GLAAE at ( a 1 DlALné. 2 £3 legal | Ps 4 { ; f’ ’ Ya Df+ Dubie iMpertanie. and amin express &-dueteli Con fe hirt=_| | ywith onretherdistmst omuk =p Cede; and 3) it | Q nd coud, Blows and the woh Case. (lean gun Dcleeldpid Oe. . t
Docket Entries
2023-05-15
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-03
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2023-04-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2022-12-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 7, 2023)
Attorneys
Florida
Trisha Meggs Pate — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
James J. Mitchell
James Jonathan Mitchell — Petitioner