Why is the right to petition the government for grievances not being honored in this case, along with others, in accordance with the First Amendment and further why are decisions being made by lower courts without hearings or in front of a jury, which is contrary to the Seventh Amendment?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : , 1. Why is the right to petition the government for grievances not being honored in this case, along with others, in accordance with the First Amendment and further why are decisions being made by lower courts without hearings or in front of a jury, which is contrary to the Seventh Amendment? ~ : oo Do 2. Why are companies being allowed to advertise and sell dangerous substances, such as those manufactured by the defendant of this case, to the public without any government regulation of said substances and why are they not being ordered by lower courts to pay damages to injured persons who consumed their products, as is the right of petitioners : under the First Amendment? ; : ae 3. Defendant was supposed to provide a medical treatment, which had benefits outweighing the risks. Petitioner, Zachary James McAlexander, was not benefitted, but in fact, suffered harm by weight gain consequently a kidney stone, pain, and emotional distress inflicted by defendant. Are companies allowed to make false claims to the American people, harm them, and subsequently escape by using attorneys who care nothing for . other people or our country and by having no juries in our courts? oO : 4. Defendant deprived Petitioner of liberty and property without due process of law. They : harmed him physically without consent and interfered with his wealth. The lower courts violated the Seventh Amendment. Can companies in the US harm unsuspecting citizens and deprive them of life, liberty, and property without due process of law using attorneys and lower courts that violate the Seventh Amendment? _ . : i .