No. 22-6965
Seth Grant Huntington v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act common-law-battery eighth-circuit-interpretation johnson-precedent johnson-v-united-states state-assault-statute statutory-interpretation violent-felony
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-04-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether treating a state assault statute as a 'violent felony' under the Armed Career Criminal Act when that statute requires no more than the intent to commit a common-law battery violates this Court's decision in Johnson v. United States
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether treating a state assault statute as a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act when that statute requires no more than the intent to commit a common-law battery violates this Court’s decision in Johnson v. United States, 559 U.S. 133 (2010). i
Docket Entries
2023-04-17
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2023-03-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 7, 2023)
2023-01-03
Application (22A579) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until March 2, 2023.
2022-12-19
Application (22A579) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 1, 2023 to March 2, 2023, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Seth Huntington
Thomas Shiah — Law Offices of Thomas H. Shiah, Ltd., Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent