No. 22-6966

In Re Antwoyn Terrell Spencer

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2023-03-08
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-decisis constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process due-process-clause final-decisions grand-jury grand-jury-clause indictment jurisdiction statute-of-limitations
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-06-22 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court erred in refusing to address the merits of the petitioner's motion to dismiss the indictment for lack of jurisdiction

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : U HGCA! Moyen | | | | _ | : | | | | | | , | | | _ | ° | | LL Dartiat Appear he Cup LD) WP he Cate pith tvir Dade Ae 99-3103 Ang 22-324l Initea Seidet Distock Courd Por She Dittrich OF innesitG No. O]-te MTRDW | | | | | Rio OL Cindtens | | Epic pe UD cevee! Murisa Lf poe 6 2. Dravisians Invilusd 2.02.1 Pogson! for Gran DUE bana ( AD A Le poveo 2 : | . Donsndr 2 Appellate Decisis Pppendlx_B=Diserier Chute Na | | ng | | | Wn | | | mI, Fou) FT ANY PoTpes | NIT Pv 277 HVty) L™ (Ela 9k ° 357 (IM) 7) CS IYI) A DUNC) FU DINSUT abso PO Lig PUY sv) AUDIT Del TTT ST A97 yAT OT fT Dept) VFN it PNY | a ee Wupreme COUFL EL The United (hate i Beton For Wrnd of Mandamus Me (pinion OF fhe United ates Cort Wf Ofocast Appears AF Anpendix & i Mg etd 47h) The O)inn Gf the Unitid Saks Oustritd Court Qdpeart d4 Hopenalix B | L | | Fred be iter Prom fedora Courts The dade pn whleé hp Untied state wat Maverther 07,202 | _ Ne Delton Por fehearing Was reli | f invikod under 26 UEC S 1eS/(a) ane Dsu{l) Cindiduhinal and dtatutory Provisions , Grand Gury Clause — Due Protoss Chaws. | D | | | _Wateren+ OP Cat bn dune 4, 2009, pebtione Pil i Pthn th OAS ctr ent if we niga veadec Uuctried Coure #40 ing ancl mut bar 24, 202% , Wha ovate some Cou pilitoner PLHtuoDir QO Writ pf) Mandan p Ne Ind.22-3/ 63), [SSued Qn UNapped! rder epi 6 Mitinn. Doe fh ita Miuomber 2, 2022 Nottibner AQGN issued Final Gociciin wwhin fhe Bp peat No 22-3941 | | ond denging Pre toguott The ebury’ , andate) issued ar? wy : \ peagons for Granting Thé | LOH HAN) : Title 26, Section 1241, welcomes an Final decicigne bf detract COUrtS. 29 USCS. 1241. This court has defined"Linal Gleercigns? Mt pe thas snd Me Nh gart on bn the merit of the Parhes, and Waves Nowning He @ the Courl 4 de but atecu'te the , Judgment. see Catlin y. Unrted States, “394 US 224,935, Up MMe (eind ' (Cours, Lav ly CVS Expy ('o., 166 US 24 (168s). oo Hore , pattioner moved the distried Court purcuans fo. Fed. R.Crim.D. ASIAN) 40 alismiss the indictment . Agari hier because 15 years 7 _) 6 PAsed find the charged HANG rn alg Dbt Deen Deasented ~ | : Th Induelment of record 16 Mbt A tray Bill (a f rand ill returned OY a iin ae pasa fa BEE Podity r further epotendad, 410 Cuparte Burn, (2EUe lt (se) in Qhfence Fa grand jac Indictment fe court lack Yurisadserio bila, him and Hie case, Wherefore fhe indictment must be @ Uismussect Por lack 6F duadhor ty. The (ustrict Court was Qlerted _ Phat + had trud ; Convicted and pushed pPaikoner Without the — Dpwer th dO 6, iNQXtess OF He urisdictin and IN Wibladt on of Phe Conshdution And [ows in Suppark — here ee FP Novirtheless, the disriel cpyrt ~~ ent ing Hale AWDcrreumvyenf , ‘snl SVQ tetused to. Address ~~~ ~ 7 ee Whe merits of Dettoner's minor der tut GND Incgead the — led ailuded tothe Federal ru ll ts background bf Une (G82. Pf degin BTMENE ONE —pecauise Pudi oner moved the didciek— ~~ dismiss Por [gat Of Juris dteton, the ~——Pistriet Court Pauling 4 addcass ~@ ettioner's im nits 40_Lie bt of 4a) ——NeeNure if 1 Nit a final deerson ~——fLght oF this Court's procedant a patente Pall the boc OF ne hc hs Ni denon Cappel — ae ap MOte J UCL GICH ID fo Com _ gn. [stariac Chit oh tue ee ROC Vv. E vappr | US 2 Mt 63 (JAYS HASH Se —— LHGAN. Carland, 27 US. 968 1410) a : luithoud ie Courd necsisn , € AC (H0 tofu i turd 6 ase proper i lage tt ag ett aap ay rc ed glen 6 dhe quteisdichin bE ip may. ~ 46 5¢ pe é Dany, U3 lye Tre — Jisurance 2851 Ufusting A at 062, -@ US tle Company Vv. nc mM ~The Eighth Cray ae WS. th I . ic § [os (a) rus piv i tinder |e appead of manda. Hao. Sue oe (eure f as i 29-394(y, RAecans _ in 4 the duathori¢ 46 Se phig == fy mpanyme ol cult Cou NB WSU dhe (Ue _(¢ vial jt s dhe diel ~~ ewes Phe Fughdh trl ~~. NONE Tn oro She CoS _— Pipetite ucisdicye Ge pee — , A Pinal decision bf fhe ee oo ROU EIS Qed for appl — DST cuir wing anid ton —— _ Dettongc humbly Quist o order ——— Othe rae mye Eight Crtult 1 Sede aside | cud Mant and Mand

Docket Entries

2023-06-26
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2023-06-06
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-05-13
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2023-05-01
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2023-04-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
2023-03-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-11-18
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 7, 2023)

Attorneys

Antwoyn Terrell Spencer
Antwoyn Spencer — Petitioner
Antwoyn Spencer — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent