Whether the lower court violated Appellant's constitutional rights

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED © The lover cark violated Amellanks Comskitrorl eats Kay Sua ieckina 40 erat . Stactig “at Serta © the laser cork Violated. by nosy seperate seakences of \ncureerakion tor Cork \ CDS Deletion of hero 5 Counts Lith he ken to ‘pathoke heson . (the loser courk vidated, Anpedlant s Constittinal Rishnks Co rok ai rene the tonvichinter Daebrion OF heow , Yisbr bation de Cotaine, anh Yossescion toh wret+to deltibze heroin because Me dvsence OF vegesentahie, sanpliy bay Ww Sereakists Yenderng der Kesha Coe the Weight oy Yevowreh suostarces laddny a Su vient Bada basis. Othe loser Courk viata, lqpalarts Comotteroal pls bi oot (eran Yue sentences Che to on Jouns events . © the lower cout violated Agpelawts Cores-trotional (igltts veto Ge Vt Fado Clase. © The loser Courk violabed, Aepedtact S Corel oronal Redits Auerto Sow Qrovess O& Kaw