Whether Petitioner has right of action to recover Social Security Retirement Benefits

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : 1 Whether Petitioner has right of action to recover Social Security Retirement Benefits taken by administrative : offsets on behalf of a private party who is alleged to be a non tanif, Title IVD party where no funds are owed the state in violation of the non alienation clause of 42 USC § 407. 2. Whether a child support order transmitted interstate for enforcement whose actions with the Social Security Administration garnished retirement benefits, pursuant to the comity clause, shields Defendant from liability for reimbursement of funds. . 3. Whether Petitioner’s complaint alleging garnishment gave sufficient notice to the legal action against ; Defendants. 4. Whether the complaint’s allegations of 14% Amendment violations regarding state action occurring after the tolling of New Jersey's statute of limitation for state action should not have been dismissed where : doe defendants are alleged. PARTIES TO PROCEEDING 1. William D. Jones, . 2. Carla Tention, as Director of Essex County Child Support Agency , 3. There are no corporate entities involved RELATED CASES 1. McCray v. Jones, No..2-21-cv-3937, U.S. District Court for Third District of New Jersey. Judgment entered December 10, 2021. 2. McCray v. Jones, No.21-3294, U.S. Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Judgment entered December 7, 2022. OPINIONS BELOW 1. McCray v. Jones, No..2-21-cv-3937, U.S. District Court for Third District of New Jersey. Judgment entered December 10, 2021. Unpublished.