Where the record reveals uncontested facts that the Eighth Circuit committed more than seventeen structural errors over thirty years in three related cases that never should have been prosecuted, but admits and corrects none, and the errors are not harmless but intentional compared to controlling Opinions of the Court, and the Circuit violates vertical stare decisis by not ordering refund for $38,046,524.00 in personal, untainted marital assets paid over as FTC § 13(b) restitution with no actual or imminent harm to consumers and no victims, and the Circuit uses a leak of the then-pending AMG Opinion to dismiss Mr. Blodgett's Coram Nobis appeal No. 21-1215 April 19, 2021 under FRAP R 47 procedural bypass, and the Circuit refuses to reverse Mr. Blodgett's May 1993 federal criminal conviction on a district court pre-indictment order proving Blodgett's absolute actual innocence, cause and prejudice, conflict of interest or for a fundamental miscarriage of justice related to AMG, and the Circuit is directly implicated in laundering or approving FTC and bankruptcy court laundering of more than $30,000,000.00 of the restitution and additional ERISA assets alienated by the confessed actions of AUSA's and others during a seventeen-year illegal bankruptcy, and the Circuit refuses to provide relief to Diane S. Blodgett who is 'kidnapped' preventing her testimony or claims for damages for unauthorized FTC AMG v. FTC restitution, and the Circuit refuses to analyze errors cumulatively including presumption of collateral consequences on coram nobis

QUESTION PRESENTED Where the record reveals uncontested facts that the Eighth Circuit (“Circuit”) finally dismissed a Writ of Mandamus on April 7, 2022 that documented: e Circuit commits more than seventeen structural errors over thirty years in three related cases that never should have been prosecuted. But admits and corrects none. e Noerror is harmless, all were intentional compared to controlling Opinions of the Court. Multiple errors each support automatic reversal. e Under the Opinion in AMG v. FTC, 141 S. Ct. 1341 (2021) Circuit violates vertical stare decisis by not ordering refund for $38,046,524.00 in personal, untainted marital assets Michael W. Blodgett and Diane S. Blodgett paid over on March 4, 1992 as FTC § 13(b) restitution with no actual or imminent harm to consumers and no victims. e While a stay was in force pending the AMG Opinion and no COA or briefing schedule had issued, Circuit uses a leak of the thenpending AMG Opinion to dismiss Mr. Blodgett’s Coram Nobis appeal No. 21-1215 April 19, 2021 under FRAP R 47 procedural bypass. e Without a hearing on Coram Nobis Circuit refuses to reverse Mr. Blodgett’s May 1993 federal criminal conviction on a district court pre-indictment order proving Blodgett’s absolute actual innocence, cause and prejudice, conflict of interest or for a fundamental miscarriage of justice related to AMG, ¢ Circuit is directly implicated in laundering or approving FTC and bankruptcy court laundering of more than $30,000,000.00 of the restitution and additional ERISA assets alienated by the confessed actions of AUSA’s and others during a seventeen-year illegal bankruptcy. e Circuit refuses to provide relief to Diane S. Blodgett who is ‘kidnapped’ preventing her testimony or claims for damages for unauthorized FTC AMG v. FTC restitution. ¢ Circuit refuses to analyze errors cumulatively including presumption of collateral consequences on coram nobis. QUESTION Dating back thirty-one years do uncontested facts all add up to an exceptional case related to AMG v. FTC 141 S. Ct. 1341 (2021). Compelling Mandamus under 28 U.S. C. § 1651(a), Article III, FRAP Rule 21, vertical stare decisis and Supreme Court Rule 10: Involving ministerial duties to provide relief where no appeals are possible and only the Court can say what the law is. ii In re: Michael W. Blodgett