Whether a defendant must show that his attorney could not have obtained undisclosed exculpatory evidence through diligence

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether, to establish a violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), a defendant must show that his attorney could not have obtained the undisclosed exculpatory evidence through his own diligence. 2. To the extent that there is some type of diligence requirement, what is the applicable level of diligence and does it foreclose a Brady violation where the undisclosed exculpatory documents were filed in an unpublished and procedurally unrelated case decided several years earlier. i STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES ° United States v. Ciaran Paul Redmond, No. 15CR00532-SVW, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Judgment entered January 25, 2017 and February 16, 2021. . United States v. Ciaran Paul Redmond, No. 17-50004, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Judgment entered October 24, 2018. . Ciaran Paul Redmond v. United States, No. 18-8719, Supreme Court of the United States. Petition for a writ of certiorari denied October 7, 2019. . Ciaran Paul Redmond vy. United States, No. 20CV05170-SVW, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Judgment entered February 16, 2021. . Ciaran Paul Redmond v. United States, No. 21-55142, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Judgment entered September 26, 2022, rehearing and rehearing en banc denied December 5, 2022. il