Whether the Ninth Circuit and Eastern District Court abused their discretion in holding and delaying Petitioners' cases

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; 1. WHETHER, The Ninth Circuit abused its discretion in holding and delaying Petitioners’ cases? 2. WHETHER, The Eastern District Court abused its discretion in holding and delaying Petitioners’ cases? 3. WHETHER, The District Judge was Negligence when he referred to as a “Prisoner”? 4. WHETHER, The lower 9* Circuit Court abused its discretion by agreeing with the Eastern District Court, that Case ' is “Frivolous? 7 5. WHETHER, Family Superior Court Judge Winn violated Petitioner’s Constitutional Due Process Rights, under the 14 Amendment to the United States Constitution, by ; issuing an order that deprived Petitioner of her Civil Rights to Video Tape in Public a Parking Lot Equal Protection under the Equal Protection Clause and Right and Freedom to Process her Claim in The California Superior Court and The California Appellate Court? , 6. WHETHER, Petitioner’s (Carina Conerly’s,) Family Superior Court Judge Winn violated Petitioner’s Constitutional Rights, under the 5“ Amendment of The United 2 States Constitution by ordering Petitioner to give her right to remain silent and ordered Petitioner to have specific conversations Defendant Sharif Roldan Tarpin, and failure of her to do so could result into criminal charges brought against her? 7. WHETHER, Family Superior Court Judge Winn violated Black-Petitioner’s Constitutional and Civil Rights to Equal and Just Treatment under the 1964 Civil Rights act by helping and favoring Filipino-Respondent in processing and supporting his claims and defenses to complaints herein? 8. WHETHER, Family Superior Court Judge Winn violated Petitioners’ Constitutional Rights, under the 1t Amendment of The United States Constitution by ordering Petitioner to not videotape in the public parking lot of Star Bucks and then public library?