Does r+ violate the Federal Constitution under the 14th Amendment Due Process and Equal Protection rights

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : A Does r+ violate the Federal Constitution uncer fhe [Yt Amendment Dus Process and Equal Protection rignts described by the PlamtifF in United Sjotes Bier Disinict Court OF the Central District oF Timers Case No3:12-ev-3184 736? 2. Does the U.S Cour? of Appeal fer the Seventh Circuit Jacl Junk aie po hear Phe Lssues of the Meri? Review of US Disivict Cour t for the Ce Distret+ case 3222-Cv03184-C5B 7 3. Does ie YS. Govern ment Support on rgnore the Po lice and Public Defender Aels alledge ‘34 the Plamtiff in U.S. 2st! Court For Hre Central District oF Tinns CASE No 4722-CV¥-03)849CSB ° 4, Does i+ vislate the Unit : ‘ted States € duds ? high bond and cleay him Medication fae eae oh < Riot ree a plea vader curess of incarceration after he 1 ee a 7 Force 3, Basedl on the documents filed on the docket in ISG + 3092-cv. and U.S. Court of Appeals fer the Severth Cireurh Case cc Gans case Bresel he oe a pave Paken smmeciate remedia) acrien 7 . eer 6. Would rt be wreng Sor +he Prainti fF 4 turn the au . & 8 99 A Shoo} Gun on his FY Shoot}, self at the e £ M4 Spre 7. Why om I b a! white people 2 a Domestic Baten? punished Prior +o ad: “ on after be; ey that a whe SU coche ¢ eing, Sound $i4 de we Man ° Qui} £ 8. Wh 40 Proceed + Would en ~ Why have T not b © Fetal on 2 ave bee Agwns+ me by the £en presented ay : © weleased Michael Sullivan abeed ane a yiness Qe gence on the ¢ . . t ey . No! 41-CF829 and aa-ce 38! de of the Stony geet Public wee! Case 9.X% Am I bern hela ‘ : the Sen 0. Fenden +o force me 40 pleat ia) Sangamon Co Yrmoan Cy Case In he US Digiict Comms te because I filed 2g geen prove 5 0. Why didthe $ ; 1983 Pring Feld police )Complom} domestic battery alegatia 6¢ Hie on Police NS of a why reports 4, FE Woma TS Conro PY uh: erate fak. ite Pelee 2 e 7