Whether federal judges can be held accountable for misconduct and criminal acts

ISSUES PRESENTED 1. No one is above the law. Local, State and Federal judges are not above the law. ‘ Federal judges who assume that they are above the law should realize the following: a. that they can be impeached and removed from the bench; b. that their law license is at risk; : : c. severe sanctions including disbarment may be imposed; _ d. their financial assets and real property assets may be seized; . e. ownership, possession and control of their assets may be forfeited; and f. that they may be prohibited from ever again holding any public office. “The True Administration of Justice Is the Firmest Pillar of Good Government.” That quote appears over the main entrance to the New York state Courthouse, in ’ Manhattan, New York. The one characteristic that distinguishes our U.S. Government from other governments is the penchant for justice, uniformly and impartially administered. “The United States Attorneys and the U.S. Attorney General, vested with such dignity and power, are especially entrusted with the duty to protect the interests of all people...” United States v. Butler, 567 F.2d 885, 894 (9% Cir. March 15, 1978). The idealism of our democracy is undermined and subverted when federal judges and officers of the court knowingly and intentionally acquiesce to and in many cases participate in the criminal conspiracies being committed in real estate foreclosure proceedings. Jd at 894. 2. The U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment Freedom of Speech includes: a. The Right to Access the Courts; b. The Right to Expose Corruption in the Court(s); c. The Right to Petition the Court for redress of grievances; d. The Right to be heard in a meaningful manner and at a meaningful time; and e, The right to a fair and impartial judge and a jury. 3. Federal District Court Judge James Donato, Federal District Court J udge Jon Tigar, Superior Court Judge Noel Wise, of Alameda County, California and their co-conspirators, accomplices, surrogates and proxies have weaponized the judicial _ branches of the State and Federal government(s) in order to achieve the goal(s) of their conspiracy and successfully complete their “end game” which includes, ii. among others, the commission of the substantive crimes including but not limited the. following: a. to commit Domestic Terrorism; b. to finance Domestic Terrorism; c. to destroy the democracy of the United States; d. to disrupt the economy of the United States; e. to overthrow and undermine the government of the United States; f. to commit the crime of sedition; g. to commit the crime of subversion; h. to commit the crime of Misprison of treason; i. to commit the crime of a Misprison of felony; j. to commit the crime of Honest Services Fraud; k. to gain ownership and control of all real estate in the United States; and 1. to gain control of the U.S. [Dollar] currency. Real estate in the United States is the foundation for the U.S. [Dollar] currency; obtaining effective ownership and control of the majority if not all U.S. real estate vests in the Conspirators control over everything. 4. The “End Game” of the judges and their co-conspirators represents a clear and present danger and a very real existential threat to our U.S. Democracy. 5. Alameda County Superior Court Judge Noel Wise, Federal District Court Judge James Donato, Federal District Court Judge Jon Tigar and their co-conspirators, accomplices, surrogates and proxies, by their acts of commission and acts of omission, have committed “misconduct” defined as “conduct prejudicial to the , iii. effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts, including a substantial and widespread lowering of the public confidence in the courts among . reasonable people and bring the judicial branch of the U.S. Government into disrepute. 6. Federal District Court Judge James Donato, Federal District Court Judge Jon | Tigar and their co-conspirators, accomplices surrogates and proxies have violated: a. each respective judges’ code of