No. 22-6999

Allen Maki v. Texas

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2023-03-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appeal criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection evidence-rules judicial-jurisdiction jurisdiction motion-in-limine second-amendment statutory-interpretation texas-criminal-law
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2023-05-25 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether there is a conflict between Tex Criminal Code Art. 44.17 And Tex Gov. Code Sec. 30.00015 (a)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED (1) Whether there is a conflict between Tex Criminal Code Art. 44.17 And Tex Gov. Code Sec. 30.00015 (a). (2) Whether it fair to regard Maki’s gentle slap in the cheek asas the Police reportedstrike in the face causing bodily injury and is a sudden passion slap is regarded as violation of Tex Penal Code Sec. 22.01, while neither the victim nor Maki regarded the contact as offensive or provocative and can Maki deprived from his Second Amendment (3) Cana court regard any fact mentioned or any evidence submitted irrelevant, if they were not directly related to the day in which the violation had happened and can a defendant be prohibited from bring witnesses and submit evidence in hearings? (4) Whether it fair when the State is granted the “Motion in Limine” to prevent Maki from obtaining evidence from Police Open Record. And does requesting Police Open Record and ruling from the Office of the Attorney General are applicable to civil process only and are not allowed in criminal cases. (5) Can the Appellate Court disregard Maki’s filing of the Appeal Bond if Maki timely filed it but the court clerk failed to post it; and did the appeal courts really have no jurisdiction over the appeal. (6) Cana Judge preside in a case when she has no Jurisdiction? (7) Are Judges allowed to, out of court, prevent the delivery of subpoenas to witnesses. i

Docket Entries

2023-05-30
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-05-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
2023-05-01
2023-04-17
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-14
Waiver of right of respondent Texas to respond filed.
2023-02-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 12, 2023)
2023-02-15
Application (22A742) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until April 22, 2023.
2023-02-06
Application (22A742) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 21, 2023 to April 22, 2023, submitted to Justice Alito.

Attorneys

Allen Maki
Allen Maki — Petitioner
Texas
Steven MeyerArlington City Attorney's Office, Respondent