No. 22-7011

Charles Matthew Waters v. Anita Marie Waters

Lower Court: Minnesota
Docketed: 2023-03-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: biological-offspring civil-procedure consent consent-withdrawal due-process family-law order-for-protection order-of-protection standing statutory-interpretation withdrawal
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2023-05-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Petitioner was deprived of due process when the trial court would not allow Petitioner's withdrawal of consent to an Order for Protection, prior to issue

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether Petitioner was deprived of due process when the trial court would not allow Petitioner’s withdrawal of consent to an Order for Protection, prior to issue. Whether it is a violation of Petitioner’s due process rights to extend the protections of a | “child” under Minn. Stat. § 518B.01, to a 20 year old man who is the biological offspring of a | protected party, bypassing a right to trial to determine ownership of a contested, beloved pet. | Whether Petitioner’s initial “consent” to an Order for Protection, ever included consent 3 to surrender his pet cat to a third party adult. II. PARTIES | All Parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. The Respondent information is: , Anita Marie Waters, Respondent pro se 191 83rd Avenue NE, Apt. # 213 Fridley, MN 55432 Telephone: (612) 483-8628 III. Related Cases: There are no related cases. | IV.

Docket Entries

2023-05-15
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-01-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 13, 2023)

Attorneys

Charles Matthew Waters
Charles Matthew Waters — Petitioner