No. 22-7022

LeAnthony T. Winston v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-03-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure due-process prosecutorial-discretion sixth-amendment speedy-trial state-prosecution trial-in-absentia
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-04-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial is violated when a state prosecution continues in the accused's absence after the accused has pleaded guilty

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED of Soul, whore preesenbedl ? oe L) ZS ib cnenshbobim| Be a Feber! po scufe to indich wieud hobice, dlr te poral. Ley borane hy robin i he Hees Stake, rosecoby 2 3) Des i violate te Sno Amendment ts darminah a State prosecubon in He, accuscl > absense, wither noe, once he hs pla tof guilty ° lwels viglete dw Preces6, di bnshibu ronal Challenge mn Ye Stite, lhon wierteol ¢ | 5) Spl Avid hae bao epplcl, Wee te lich foefe us dpe a ends of foshee Contervanes WUSESKacn%)) afaul oft ddlieial Lmplomenta tion vnler I th US. sH1f é , | GC) Diet to Vigna brevib Court abose its cliscntin, by tole Processing the presceurbion in my absense, ox i dy of ty Hie ? , , 1) bon for # Dishiet Curb Kay of a la stibobind! Vib la tay and provicle. 1 Homecly Conbinmnce? Quod inns Preosunteal ee ns tacomnndy by) Whether the evarantate ar Debondllungl os teat ty blast — Startes vbeueaen US. Dish LEXIS guashig Lila Sats x Shadi NI, dhSeudants Sith Sandor! Soaicly Decl sighs ebhbabal. LEE td Ss helt 0 Sta 0-10 ds) ——$ : upton 159 S.0b. lod A849 401 a esioinal Prnsecunion Lookinnus ond the de terdant domains om accusedl curse ah the tiybles Arovicloel by ty SKI Seren awn ya Lok a Soon L temhewct £3 Lorposetl. ) he inch i PINLH nla on at te ix 4 Cheencl*on ‘g QLbH) Fle . 0.2 ntormenl Ft Yo, Nature dmc Cause. of the ae wo. Cnusing tho Dubber to be. o auliwel | OF Yo libs inbepes! to envollp Spoedy tial Om iM ‘on then Vislatul te Loven monk is telly te bloom te any nasi lag VILL) LIL te BASH to Jt. oh aK g P Lip LL 62. $F 0, 0B BCL 0b duwscl, bvause ty, jpratcl typ Hepguesh Ae te ttle eacleee (4 ) Tks Ving | Sache’ hes ben LlarSye vie bul UAT As Va Cocke 8MdAYE ah Merkel on Sp. 1l040, awd ao Ls ralec8 tens. clypriaul hit} a e. DWOCELS 15 the keruenmnt Aas adhnjle ul the Jooslathan of puidlence ( Sivesdei vheen Malar borp 113A 583, 890C0Uk tie d00i)); Shem th pre suture yy 314 Ce Ev. doo) Mowerouee Z. tows inchuwsely alle bal“ by teponty ache pie pe ips ty a he iM hichat Mid dnd fe $<$ ny binbae sr Covi he Meath ba Sone. my tial, and susublig ia bea = damage 0 se publi —_ a oY Led ling U fe y. oi t, Mclicial Nobece provssvambe ts Rule olen Evid, oof th March 8, 40a USM. Today Secick. | Since om mace inate ty. did weal tot a tube (ose tox tule To bd Lain he a i, ‘i : J q : . Obboter terran bung Hole in toe Nytn os LU SMUsSa Le Laut, AL 6 LE od 0, FUCGAY Shah biibuk Y Ol LL : Of. FMM .

Docket Entries

2023-08-21
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-07-27
DISTRIBUTED.
2023-05-10
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-04-17
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-12-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 14, 2023)

Attorneys

Leanthony Winston
Leanthony T. Winston — Petitioner
Leanthony T. Winston — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent