Lester Barnett v. North Carolina
Was it unconstitutional for them to convict petitioner for a safecracking that happened while petitioner was confined at Mecklenburg County Jail on the day the offense was committed on November 5, 1980
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . (:) Was it UNCONSt ditional for them to convict petitioner for A Sateerackina that happen While pehtioner was confine AT MecK len burs county Jit! on the day the offense WAS committed oN November 5, 1980.2 vio lation ot Due Process of law of the 5,614 Amendmeat ot the United States Constitution. i) was it un const tut owal for the City of Gastonta Not 46 disclose eVidence favor Able to him in viol atien United States consth tut onal Amend ment 5 6, 1G Also NC. Conch tutian al APT TZ, Section Ig, 1G A4. (iii) was it Unconstitutional for them to im Pose a Life Sentence for Attempt robbery, And Safecrach ng on # Commi Hed Youthtu | Offender When N.C. Gen Stak Seclion 98-49, 8(b) Provides ‘A Committed Vouthtul offender Shall be released Conditional) undev Supervision And or before the expiration of four years from the date £ his: Committment. O ‘ : , th Carolina +o remove the ctatae Nam ber for A committed fonts O fferder | -8'7 (d) And replaced if wiih wen ies United States” Constitution al Aim ewd ment S, 6,14 Also WC. Constitution Act L, section 18,19, a3.