Did the Ninth Circuit err in concluding that a non-constitutional error was harmless when it found 'ample,' rather than 'weighty,' evidence of guilt contrary to Kotteakos v. United States and Brecht v. Abrahamson?

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Did the Ninth Circuit err in concluding that a non-constitutional error was harmless when it found “ample,” rather than “weighty,” evidence of guilt contrary to Kotteakos v. United States and Brecht v. Abrahamson? prefix