No. 22-7034
Earnest Gibson, IV v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law campus direct-supervision medical-treatment medicare-regulations off-site off-site-facility physician-oversight remote-location satellite-facility
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-04-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner's PHP was in violation of Medicare's requirement that treatment must have occurred under a licensed physician's direct supervision?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ‘ . 1. Whether pursuant to Medicare regulations defining the . terms "off-site," "“campus," “remote location," and "satellite facility," established that Petitioner's PHP was not operation in violation of Medicare's requirement that treatment must have occurred under a licensed physicians "direct supervision"? « 2. Whether the appellate court's opinion denying COA was in error pursuant to Strickland v. Washington and Slack v. McDaniel? ;
Docket Entries
2023-04-17
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-01-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 17, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent