No. 22-7040
Michael Lee Gordon v. Doe, Designation Sentence Computation Center Official, et al.
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-law agency-review bias civil-procedure constitutional-review due-process judicial-discretion legal-procedure recusal standing statutory-interpretation witness
Latest Conference:
2023-05-18
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in denying Appellant's motion for recusal of the district court judge based on the judge's bias as a witness in the instant case
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED %D) Whether or not rhe dictrict Coury LPO ne d be dens)ng Aypellarts o>} f' for Cecesal of rhe dd cetrick court \e doe bo sed Upo~ the Sudee bem ce] he my) Os 4 Weness IW £he pnetant © case 7. YX IL) W he ther or not the d istered court erroned ha dens ing Afpe llant FO Petes. of in for YuQ Po YU peri UN dec rhe Nw lnepe don ger Oo £ Ser lous phos (CO J nywrs exception?
Docket Entries
2023-05-22
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2023-05-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
2023-03-20
Motion (22M83) for leave to file a petiton for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal Granted.
2023-03-01
MOTION (22M83) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2022-08-26
Motion (22M83) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.
2022-08-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 19, 2023)