No. 22-7056
Alexander Cameron v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
IFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-law due-process false-evidence free-speech judicial-procedure standing supreme-court takings writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-05-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated by the dismissal of his appeal based on the state court's erroneous application of the 'no-crime' doctrine
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED ‘pe on a5 LGA MOrye “EF rots in -+the o Te : é OY OQ Ded | _|
Docket Entries
2023-05-22
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2023-05-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
2022-10-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 20, 2023)