No. 22-7062

Ricardo Noble v. John E. Wetzel, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2023-03-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment discretion-abuse due-process equal-protection prison-classification retaliation standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2023-04-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether it is unconstitutional for judges and prison staff to allow their personal prejudices to interfere with their ability to do their job

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : | UESTZONS PRESENTED | Ths UnconStitu tonal for judges and Prison $taer to allow their PET Sonal preyadices te interfere | with their ability to de their job. LiteKky v WSs, WY7LIIDDS | Crus wbeto, YOSus, 39UI7ZD, : a ; , oS + : Y | haw . |. Th + ecred/abused discretion by rgnorins and Caley ERAT capleneeess Stated thar S6.t7 Cree pe defendants and other Sc LoGreene Start Classified and Aweats NGE(SL) AS STG because PennsylVania Dive. classifies the NGECSL)AS 4 STA, des pipe fact shot . Head of PA, Dil: statedin aber regarories/Pleadin ge that¢ the PALDO.e Never Classified the NGELS#) AS AS7E 2, The courterced/abused dosceretion by ignoring Law ank fact that defen {eee Adm ttre Sand petitioner's EXhroits ve rifiéd, that S.c.d5 Greene defendants ans other Bed oreene Stal Ew ithout arth arity or basissan 6 EA Vidlot ior OF PA1D.0.Ce policy, clo ssi fre dftreoate b NGCELS%o) @S & gag and S7G@ and petitione © asa S76 member because he SO NGE(S +s © 6 FE i 3, The ceuct erre dfabuse & dose cetyon by hers; NG law , and fa cf defendants adwmut, and pettioner's exhibits verity that No St&if7 Greene defendant oc dtherc S-ecLr Cceene STATE had aurnenty oc basis ‘re classify eetitionec as a s7TEmembec Or noEeGYa)as O STE oe cui Y fhe coucterre d/apusces discreten by falsely claiming pet itvone c_waS hot classed asa S7G mem ber’ because he i NGE(S%), despite Fact thar defeadauts agmited, and Petitione c's exhibits vecikied a that if was because fretitionec (S NGELSof) +e re ae «Ss The couct ercedfabused disccetivn by Zlaiming af “immareria\" the Couct usihg "Department of corcect/onslmoc” | and “sag -@reene" intecckron geatal y as (Ff they are thé Same, despt© pe tittoaec’S clear diStinction. between Sidi Green™ defendants? ahd other Sct Greene _ StAFES FeFarraro ry basele Sand unautharized practices polices and ve ulations ré, égar da} and pedesylvernin a rncat ding the NGE 5%) Poucie S, Practices; a nt OF Corgectio nes , and Feguletions . a G, The Couct er ed regarding Such and Pet tionec's exhibeot defendants Abe F STG eribere mitted that ther Si CEr Gene fend ents False ly alleged icdents news Back organ b, ; ve Fore Hone 0 OONG 6 Oe Security oer roner wee never placa Aches, “DES Z The feuct ar ecoup S7EMY) Prog edin Feel Gad ft Geeet’s era Jaoused dis gram, ce cert we a rsm SS pete ane iSeretion by a fF te constitution fa iftonec'ys Jee OOTY Jed Firming despite AA, loc pee Exe Cukel(ot Ameadon gent on pie evidence S4ppo hho Relais ent oF : 3, The couch erred/ bi S petitioned’ Claim, ; . Rk Courts JCA areas ArScretion b S clara vices 9. 4 sing pértioner? Reuren gi Tedl ot Firmin ft The cour erred/abs . t-PA Glaim gMent on 3S pisdvect Court ord used disere tit bectaa, and a: L oerde Cs grontrin Si TON by af¢} . eau se oS petiione c's Eishth Ames i Contine Meat Claw +o: hth Armen nes SMe wk ON oo Jo. The court evred eT EM eAaae nce Condition Distried court's ocdecsS Seawein dike re ft; “ete s te The Couch & Conspiracy I dudgmeaton’ Disterct cour ¥ poedfabuse A d: Clacm , on Prote yp “3 otder diSsmrss; isore Fee tote. ction claw ig petitioned FEM AG fa. The cou cf erred, . ‘ . Ck 3 EQua\ 5 : pi sees 1 Jabuse d acs ofS ‘ i cf courys. order Ar simes G ’ cretion lo , toy oF Feprteen th kine Adame Sing petitioner's Owe Pre 73, The couct ecred ab < 6 _ ‘ . . . pisrevet couc T'S orae LAO, Leen by PIPER, uatimely, baseless and over feaching Beker dedi extreme eae § ConxadiiNG evidentiary 2 Motion To strike treméty pistoncs| Morec in veigred to ANCL Back 9-gu all ift petitioner Amended complaint CAGiIMsS and ve and rh efendants : : “6 oo . . : Disteic € Cou fcouct’ et erred their 2 okthee har etal is nse Dist 15, The © javolve Ment. Supe ew sor chad Peast . rere The cours ered dy tek or lrabil pty . CAS AALS 1 rdec dis abused deg te ‘ yf and Ib these OF eae Secret 7S coe vise ei The smisting claims a9 4 by atte, Avie te court ecced/a CaPpace again’ AVEC, Ersek gas ork Unbused Acs a. ao ast “ag t bo. endaant cSme aSeret

Docket Entries

2023-04-17
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2023-03-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-27
Waiver of right of respondent Wetzel, Sec., PA DOC, et al. to respond filed.
2023-03-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 21, 2023)

Attorneys

Ricardo Noble
Ricardo Noble — Petitioner
Ricardo Noble — Petitioner
Wetzel, Sec., PA DOC, et al.
Anthony Thomas KovalchickPennsylvania Office of Attorney General, Respondent
Anthony Thomas KovalchickPennsylvania Office of Attorney General, Respondent