No. 22-7065
Ahmed Abu Khatallah v. United States
IFP
Tags: acquitted-conduct constitutional-rights criminal-law criminal-statute due-process extraterritorial-application extraterritorial-jurisdiction sentencing sentencing-enhancement sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Arbitration
Arbitration
Latest Conference:
2023-06-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) apply extraterritorially?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Does 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) apply extraterritorially? ii. Do the Fifth and Sixth Amendments prohibit a court from basing a criminal defendant’s sentence on conduct of which a jury has acquitted the defendant? i
Docket Entries
2023-06-26
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-08
Reply of petitioner Ahmed Abu Khatallah filed. (Distributed)
2023-06-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-05-24
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-05-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 24, 2023.
2023-05-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 22, 2023 to May 24, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-04-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 22, 2023.
2023-04-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 21, 2023 to May 22, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-03-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 21, 2023)
Attorneys
Ahmed Abu Khatallah
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent