Whether the petitioner is entitled to release from involuntary detention

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WHETHER THE PETITIONER IS ENTITLED TO RELEASE FROM INVOLUNITARY DETENTION FROM THE CARE,CUSTODY AND TREATMENT OF THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES TREATMENT AND DETENTION FACILITY PURSUANT TO THE ILLINOIS SEXUAL VIOLENT PERSONS ACT 725 ILCS 207/1 et seq. WHERE THE PETITIONER HAS BEEN PENDING SINCE JUNE 26,2012 WITH NO CIVIL COMMITMENT HEARING IN VIOLATION OF SIXTH AMENDMENT,WHICH PROTECTS BASIC DEMANDS 1). TO PREVENT UNDUE AND OPPRESSIVE INCARCERATION PRIOR TO A CIVIL COMMITMENT HEARING,AND 2). TO MINIMIZE ANXIETY AND CONCERN ACCOMPANYING PUBLIC ACCUSATIONS AND 3). TO LIMIT THE POSSOBILITIES THAT LONG DELAY WOULD MEAN LOSS OF JOBS,DISRUPTS FAMILY LIFE,IT ENFORCES IDLENESS,HINDERED GATHERING OF EVIDENCE, TO CONTACT WITNESSES OR TO PREPARE THE PETITIONER'S DEFENSE. © | WHERE THE COURTS OF WINNEBAGO COUNTY ILLINOIS, SECOND DISTRICT APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS,THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT AND THE UNITED STATES DIS= TRICT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS HAVE FAILED OR REFUSE TO ADDRESS THIS MOST HONORABLE SUPREME COURT*S RULING IN THE MATTER OF BARKER V. WINGO 407.U.S.532,92 S.Ct. 2182 TO CONDUCT AND ACCOUNT FOR THE. TIME TOWARD A ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY DAY SPEEDY TRIAL DEMAND(12@-DAY), PETITIONER THOMAS POWERS HAS BEEN DETAINED WITHOUT A CIVIL COMMITMENT HEARING SINCE JUNE 26,2012(GOING ON TO ELEVEN YEARS) WITH THE PREJUDICE IS GREAT IN VIOLATION OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION OF THE SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS. : WHERE NOW THE SEVENTH ‘CIRCUIT REFUSED TO ADDRESS THIS MATTER BASED ON , "JURISDICTION" a aed ee