No. 22-7068
Joshua Anderson v. Mark Bolster
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: burns-v-wilson constitutional-law constitutional-review due-process fifth-amendment habeas-corpus military-courts standard-of-review writ-suspension
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess HabeasCorpus
ERISA DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-11-09
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the indistinct standard of review promulgated in Burns v. Wilson, 346 U.S. 137 (1953) violate the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause and result in an unconstitutional suspension of the writ of habeas corpus?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED a Does the indistinct standard of review promulgated in Burns v. Wilson, 346 U.S. 137 (1953); with the confusion and diverse approaches taken in the lower courts thereto, violate the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause and result in an unconstitutional suspension of the writ of habeas corpus pursuant to United States Constitution Article 1, Section 9, Clause 2? : ii .
Docket Entries
2023-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-27
Reply of petitioner Joshua Anderson filed. (Distributed)
2023-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023.
2023-10-06
Brief of respondent Mark Bolster in opposition filed.
2023-09-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 6, 2023.
2023-09-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 22, 2023 to October 6, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-08-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 22, 2023.
2023-08-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 23, 2023 to September 22, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-07-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 23, 2023.
2023-07-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 24, 2023 to August 23, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-06-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 24, 2023.
2023-06-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 14, 2023 to July 24, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-05-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 14, 2023.
2023-05-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 15, 2023 to June 14, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-04-13
Response Requested. (Due May 15, 2023)
2023-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
2023-03-29
Waiver of right of respondent Mark Bolster to respond filed.
2023-03-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 24, 2023)
Attorneys
Mark Bolster
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent