Whether Servando-Pineda's § 2255 motion sufficiently alleged constitutional claims violations due to counsel's ineffectiveness

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Should a writ of certiorari be granted since Servando-Pineda’s title 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion sufficiently alleged constitutional claims violations due to counsel’s ineffectiveness by failing to review the case law, plea agreement, and discovery before filing a frivolous motion to withdraw Servando-Pineda’s guilty plea that caused Pineda-Valdez to lose his acceptance of responsibility resulting in an extended term of incarceration. H