Question not identified

QUESTION PRESENTED IN POINT I The petitioner did not receive a Fair and impartial’ proceeding which ultimately lead to 12 b (6) dismissal. Applying the ‘de novo standard’ of review consistent with the plausibility standard’ will reveal that the District Courts actions were intentionally erroneous. The 12 (b) 6 dismissal in this cause of action is completely erroneous. The United States District court erred in dismissing the petitioners’ cause of action because it is against the weight of the stated facts and documentary evidence offered in his Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint with ‘suggestions in support of and ‘Amended Complaint’. Judge Gregory David Kays is a participating pedophile associated with the sex network the : petitioner has brought suit against and he was intentionally appointed to mismanage and Ultimately dismiss this matter. When the petitioner identified him as such in his ‘motion to recuse’ him he dismissed the matter altogether due to the graphic nature of the nude photographs of himself attached as proof. QUESTION PRESENTED IN POINT II The petitioner did not receive a ‘Fair and impartial’ proceeding in violation of the Judicial Canon Code of Ethics, Canons 1, 2, 3, 3A,3A (5) | ©. | @ The matter before the court involves a civil rights action being brought against public : officials to include multiple judges, prosecuting attorney, attorneys, Mormon Church, and branches of the Federal government to include the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, and the Department of the Army. Numerous Constitutional . rights of the petitioner herein have been violated as a result of his ex-wife’s sexual relationships with members of courts who held sway over him while maintaining jurisdictional proceedings to which he was a participant. The District Court Judge, ultimately dismissed his Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983, § 1985, § 1986, ‘Bivens’ action only after the petitioner filed a ‘Motion to recuse’ him, which was not prompted by any prior ‘order’ of the court. Instead, it came about as a result of the courts complete refusal to manage the proceedings in accordance with the rules that govern them, and his office. The petitioner attached nude photographs of District Court judge ‘Greg Kays’ . to this petition giving him notice that it is known that he is an active participant in this sex ring that includes other public officials who are violating the petitioners’ Constitutional ; rights, and as such his removal is but a compulsory exercise, as he clearly is not an . impartial judge presiding over a Fair’ hearing. ; . Judge Greg Kays dismissed this petition and subsequently issues an ‘S.0.C.’ order _ commanding the Court Clerk to refuse any more filings of the petitioner. He claims this was _ done as a result of the petitioner attaching nude exhibits to this petition. Yet, the entire case revolves around this subject matter and the petitioner has attached nude photographs of the Respondents to as many as six different ‘Motions’ over the course of nine months as evidentiary support pursuant to the Federal Rules of evidence. It did not become an issue until he was personally exposed, and his actions are nothing more than an attempt to conceal his identity and participation in this conspiracy. ® @ The petitioner filed for a ‘Writ of Mandamus’, 22-1825, in the Eighth Circuit Court of . Appeals and attached these same photographs as exhibits. Proof that the Trial court judge is biased and an active participant in this ongoing conspiracy. The Eighth Circuit judge hearing this matter issued an ‘S.0.C.’ order as well commanding the petitioner to explain his actions, even though they had already been explained previously in his ‘Amended Pleading’, and in his ‘S.O.C. Response’ he cited specific F. R. of Evid., and Supreme Court First Amendment ‘Free Speech’ precedent giving him a legal right to do so. : It’s blatantly clear the Eighth Circuit court of appeals motives in these matters are nothing more than