No. 22-7081

Tamir Abdullah v. Texas, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-03-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-procedure habeas-corpus judicial-jurisdiction qualified-immunity standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2023-05-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether petitioner has a right to have his allegations disputed by respondents

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : -QUESTION(S). PRESENTED Lo ol “22 Uibeas Cape (nppltmno be coebPeore Or AY peal ate ty \ Dem ep: NO« PO< 5/05 Hees "coe iy ) o peght +o hitve hoe patoens heaped avg his allege ons Les puted by Responcteats! b: d9cv -Ib0 pouien 8 visu CoURT = Fels 9000+ a Sheuld Muse Sank on £ then Wet -#e7t/ pow TUN Key) ave. admavestery/ orden e AN X-RAY (Caner D0 ef Av6) do hefecmne 1A hebrawer hae Any broken lowes ? \WAS Lats deliberate inh Keeace 7? 5 Does fettiower have He. waht to be fo unvol ge lty “y A uty He his peees witar) 402 Sven lays eR The (Pecleant S eedly +e net) OR, can felt Com Shoe er . Dept detarpw AW move cent ofRartee Chitaged wiih A Crime a AN ineclore Removal Amount of— time, # \V thot dai? F— Does fetter have protectron agin S}— , LN ReaSonmb|(e searches owol se; zuces ra Polece Offrue per his US. G@NST Amend wer 5— Does fetitrower ejay the US. Cons7? sp menT Unht do bear aaa OND Amend men T (Uy (RAINS | —_ Dee Ss Fe LpTeee heaye fe Saath Amend | eat of Sele —Lepresen inten ioe ca ussse.| oO as C08 Siw 7 Qh Adkeg unt, E CH ve Co unset’ On ~, Codwsel be (leet on him ad Ais (Lea ht to self — Le par SeastnH ro) Agbitraaly — +4 Ken) ° Te—Does pethwere have the Poctr Amendment eight to [reeaty ¢ = Does Litronmere an 0 the. Lotectron J we) self. ic (owe koran en qr U.S, usr 5th pyrene G.— Shell te Disteee+ coir have gen Pe fone AN © pren -/4 amencl ht: aul / lem ying them 9 (Greemeamans ) [O— Should He CouctT of AEP ERS Nave a tected tle. Dxsmecl Covet” -fo fld ress the com @ lat basght— 94 the. fobtynee on the Ment? (6: 22CV ~(60) 3 ik = Ale +here, aay Rights that fefhwe eos aS A Owivep STATES cHize ? __ Coes bhnere have A (LE. COURSR. ‘+ his ecco dom fnew tepaisms/ nmenismende Be Chuestiony (2] G4) : Quesfiws (ReWMED conte (Ss — Ate the loner CGuaty CORR iy Statug had . Tre STATE or TEKAL io CAM Ot be held [table for Py) eS Suffered by efi roneg ¢ FroecteD oe SleNenih jnosdhent-? AL ES Te tote sre lelleens Foleo — Rpk ts wok an entity that Can be suep aS Clamed bp te Ckeur— (ORE denuyhts his Claim ? 5, Joly 98, 2070. Retiree actiemyted do ger Cele fiom the Cost; arbinay denn of — RefonweS Habeas Conpus nd OthOg. motions, LS qe Thikd Distert Cour & XCOALS MN err cbr dig hey lack jodsdtch on é (C. Ake the [omer Court ORS —|tg bhg © the RH onee. Con CERMINg his clon ?

Docket Entries

2023-05-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
2023-03-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 24, 2023)

Attorneys

Tamir Abdullah
Tamir Abdullah — Petitioner
Tamir Abdullah — Petitioner