Michael James Hoffman v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Did the State violate the Petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to counsel and due process?
ESTIONS PreseNTEb SO 4 To secure its 2ollond 2012 the State violate Petitioner's Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel and Te Due Process wheaitcccunvented his existing Stabe, defense. counsel, ensuring Sree ceign 4» preseiatits newly fabricated _aeusations, aod 4.conceal entice. investigations trom bath grand jucies? 2, To secure the. State's 2013 false convictions, did the State Bublic Defender violate _Petihoner's Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment Rights To Due Process byt _a Vacatiag Pobtioner's pcedrial evidentiary hearings, ___b. Withholding all defense evidence from Pebhioned's trial? __. Refusing to inapeaca blatant Stake suborined pecjunpattrial? _4. Manipulaking defense evidence truse-agaiasthis onindefeadant of trial? __e. Tying tofowce Petitioner betestity againsthimself? 3, Did Ae Stabe Public Defender violate Petitioner's Eifth Sith,and Fourbeenth _ Ameadment Rights To Due Process. by investigating tts own Rule 32 (Thelnebfecdive _hesistaace.of Counsel) wloich cesubted in” Frovedurally Defaulted Claims ,ubbimately _infectiny his Habeas Corpus proceedings bys 4 Nob caising aay of Petitioner's specific. cequests.on Appeal ocin Rule 32? _b Delivering cornupled transcripts te conceal ids misconducattrial? _e Defying. 5 cauet odes to produce the. “entire trial file! in POR proceedings? _4. To protect the State's 2014 seatence, did the Arizona Depactment of Corrections Violate. Pebitiones's Fourth Awendmant RighbTo Be Secure ia his housing ond papers, __ ___and his Fifth, ond Fouckeoath Amendment Rights To Due Process by: a. Removing-covecup evidence (coreupted transcripts) from his housing? _b Seizing trial evidence [ELDVDs) then bing tthe U.S Distcick Court? _tlnberceptiag his mail, inten ded-for-the US, Supreme Court?