No. 22-7098

Rashid Turner v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2023-03-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 4th-amendment bank-robbery-act cell-phone cell-phone-search double-jeopardy exclusionary-rule good-faith good-faith-exception hobbs-act search-and-seizure warrant warrant-requirement
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether good faith should apply when law enforcement agency has a policy, written or unwritten, where the officer who conducts a search of a cell phone is not provided a copy of a judicially authorized warrant before searching a cell phone

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether good faith should apply when law enforcement agency has a policy, written or unwritten, where the officer who conducts a search of a cell phone is not provided a copy of a judicially authorized warrant before searching a cell phone. Whether the Double Jeopardy Clause is violated when a defendant is convicted under both the Hobbs Act and the Federal Bank Robbery Act for the same incident. i LIST OF PROCEEDINGS 1. United States v. Rashid Turner, Case No. 8:18-cr-00080, United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida; judgment entered September 13, 2019; 2. Rashid Turner v. United States, Case No. 19-13704; United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit; Petition for Rehearing En Banc denied December 21, 2022; judgment entered December 29, 2022; 8. Rashid Turner v. United States, Case No. ; United States Supreme Court; ii

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-18
Reply of petitioner Rashid Turner filed. (Distributed)
2023-08-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-14
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-06-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 14, 2023.
2023-06-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 14, 2023 to July 14, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-05-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 14, 2023.
2023-05-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 15, 2023 to June 14, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-04-13
Response Requested. (Due May 15, 2023)
2023-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
2023-03-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-03-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 24, 2023)

Attorneys

Rashid Turner
Michael P. Maddux — Petitioner
Michael P. Maddux — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent