Whether the Fourth Circuit's bright-line rule denying equitable tolling to North Carolina prisoners who lack access to legal resources violates the constitutional mandate established in Bounds v. Smith and reiterated in Lewis v. Casey

No question identified. : ue sTIONS PRESENTED? ee 6s) ISSVE? Me RoGEerts URGES THAT THE TNSTANT CASE TLL MINATES A CONTINVOUS FLOW OF MERLTORIoOUS, BUT TMPROVIDENTLY DRAFTEO, AND UNTIMELY FLLED HABEAS PETITIONS ARRIVING IN THe Fouvern Cerecurs Couetor Apegsis FromTHe Noary Cagoirna (NC) Fentear Covers. Its Flow oF Pererrous REPRESENT NC 3 TWENTY PlS YEAR CONSTRUCTIVE CONTEMPT For THe CoustiruriowAL MANOATE TssvEn BY THts Court Upon NC PER St ry Bounos v Smutty, 430 US O17, $2) B28 , AT ACr 144 ( 14771) 4ND REITERATEn tn LEwss v Casey, 51M US 343, 350, Le Ser 2174 (1496). NCS conremer For Bowes ¢ Lewes xs _ ANOS OTHER SovRCes CF LEGAL KNOWLED6E FROM Ali NC : _ PR1s0NS,(2) BARRING THE NC Supreme Court LroerRarys SALE OF LEGAL RESOURCES To NC Personers, (3) DEFUNDING __ ano