Whether a violation of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure constitutes a cognizable error as provided by Rule 52(b)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | : cain cy prosecular enter eddttanc| charges in. An indichment Lithoot tre added counts hans, Suparceded. or returned by dre Grand Suny While Under cathy 2) IP c Grend SU fopemen ener c, retum iIndictmen Of three com -an tre Governmest submit a for aunt © ON ANndichvent Lorthak noting the dabrdont of added OF cirmended. Clrerse “be cerreste by a nation counts added ° KY Does a nolehon constivle a clenicel amor 45 Promded by RUE Re 5) iS i ples af Fes. 2; crimtnc} Praedye binding eo tre govemmen} dsithheld proffer fron defontay} lou, The nalure of the cheesy SErinsk him ena hyve conetamcey OF his Plec = Does sud, river of Bir end Sixth Amendmark tach Mmhty based on « Cans anc) — INVeid ples Chdarminag the credinhig ens pbic Vopchee of the Kdite,| PRBWinKy ENA SH Congh}ohonc| Princip}g MD) Does & trcl Sudse hes tre etthorr ts, ke ask ) cy dafendenk "IDS you Lnay how Strong tine evidence IS cRHins} Yaz — When tne dofendent wish do his ples af quis, before bad) acrerad,, oe tre