No. 22-7121

Christopher Barret v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2023-03-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2255 criminal-procedure de-novo-resentencing de-novo-review direct-appeal resentencing sentencing sentencing-discretion vacatur
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2023-04-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether district courts must conduct full de novo resentencing following vacatur of one or more counts

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether, following the vacatur of one or more counts, either pursuant to a direct appeal or a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, a district court must conduct a full de novo resentencing? 2. Whether, even if district courts are required to hold full resentencings following vacatur on direct appeal, 28 U.S.C. § 2255 nevertheless gives courts discretion to hold limited proceedings rather than full de novo’ resentencings following vacatur of a count of conviction on a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion? 2

Docket Entries

2023-04-24
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
2023-03-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-03-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 26, 2023)

Attorneys

Christopher Barret
Brendan Meyer WhiteWhite & White, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent