Taking into account that the nonfinal order issued by the lower civil court in case 2017CA004797 is an order that denied the Defendants' Motion to Disqualify the Plaintiffs Counsel and that Florida Appellate Rule 9.130(a)(3)(E) allows a nonfinal appeal from an order that denied a motion to disqualify counsel, please answer the following questions:

1. Does a nonfinal appeal, which was rightfully admitted under Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(E), qualify to be dismissed by the court, claiming it is dismissed as being from a nonappealable nonfinal order pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(E)?

2. Does the dismissal of the nonfinal appeal Case 2D20-3160, which produced by the misinterpretation and misapplication of Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(E), rob the Appellants, who are US citizens, of their constitutionally guaranteed rights to due process and equal protection under the laws?

3. Does the unjustifiable dismissal of the nonfinal appeal case 2D20-3160 without a written opinion purporting the correct application of Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(E), which created a great controversy in the interpretation and application of that law and resulted in an issue of public importance, constitute a violation of the Appellants' rights to due process of law and equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1 of the United States Constitution?

Does a nonfinal appeal qualify to be dismissed by the court, claiming it is dismissed as being from a nonappealable nonfinal order?