No. 22-7142

William Matthew Plump v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-03-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process fraud legal-ethics legal-misrepresentation mail-fraud misrepresentation sentencing wire-fraud
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-04-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Due Process Clause prohibits the government from using criminal fraud to punish or penalize an attorney for immaterial misstatements or omissions to the court

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED. ee The law of fhe: Exehth Corea that an. aittomey \nolates te tederzA Iai i a -fand wire fraud Statutes, IF As... && WS. and [SH5, it ‘they make. Materal a ——vsshatenents Oc Omissions fo. the Courts. United States v.. Hansmaec,. 498 a F388 (Fh Cir 2on). Ab Rebtioner’s. Semtencing , Counsel for the — ae ppvernnertfalsely claimed that Fetitionee. Wuis.O” fens Supervised release ae When he..commetted. his offenses and. thot. Pebhoner 1s sprig dees . —— his child's diaper beg, These akenal isstakenonks were Uiclasens of te cee ee. —iphicia aud Shite / according +p He Ev Corts Hanspeter decision. . a of question. presente) by ths petition Wo ee eee cee ~~ ee ee ~i . Lae a oe wee . ~ an wee o . ee Pos Dre Frocess._pralubit the governnant: from sing Criwinal frad to 7 —— ust. or PART! EB as AIL pockes -ogpearin te captor. on He cae pe f His abn _ rn Toe nes aan ome an ns ee ne enn eer ee —.. ee a ee ~ ee a i ee ~ 7 vee re ~ a ee ee cere oe cae erent , . op Question PRESOITIED nn nd ce _ ener We. _— veces we cee cei __. ct ne ee eee ee ce ee ee ee te ee some dls oF Prem Me WBE OF COMETS ee Pol — —— ff eBL6.0F Autonet. ee pennw we Weir OE Caer! We opines BELOW ce ne PROD MCTEN ee | lap a a — _ Hp C. Relevant Stahitang Povasuons _ op 4-5 __t (nus. & bu, 43) . : [Erde Phoenix Bord Indon Coy Z ee 3 a i S79 us.i (isa) ited! Stabe Plunge, beusc. $a () | . _ as , wo SUPREME COURT. OR THE UNITED. STATES. 0 ae cE He Wwitena mM. PLUME, Ce i Pbthene MTD STS OF AMERICA, ce | no cles secon tins eb eee n= Respodents .. a | ee + On Pebhon for a Wert of Corroreri to te ee cece ves wo + . Vked States Court of Appeals Gr the Giglth Crit if _ : te | a — fecthoner \willaan: WM Plame respectfully seeks.4 woatof Certoan _. _ 7 {fo review the {pagent of He United States . Court of Appeats br He. a as 2 a a ; oo So oo oe en es __GPivion BELOW a wl. ee i a nee cee ee oe | oo The_opin Lon. hela is unpublshed gs United States Plum y No... a 99. (Bh Gi Out.21, 2022) (per curan cad is epi in. a this Petchon, (App. -2). —— a aap oo ukisoiemed | The. Echth. Creat Cont of Appeals tsed is. decision on = ebbne 2p 202, (pp). ened He rut far rbearng TTR Noverhee.28,.2022,. Hence, this Rofitian 5 sinely.. a Court has jpesdichon to review tle deas won_of the courtof._cote Be | . . Ce RELEVANT. STINUTIRY PROVSIONE ce 4 TI. pebhan. involves He fedcral.mnatland wie Aamd. statutes, codiFed. : cee ween = in. litle AZ of he United States Code_at Chapter 63; and tally cepruted ae ih He

Docket Entries

2023-04-24
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
2023-04-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-02-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 1, 2023)

Attorneys

United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
William M. Plump
William Matthew Plump — Petitioner
William Matthew Plump — Petitioner