Denial of motion to dismiss indictment alleging unconstitutional delay

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Issue 1: Petitioner briefs the following point in an abundance of caution to preserve the issue regarding the denial of his second motion to dismiss to preserve the record regarding the denial of his second motion to dismiss the indictment alleging an unconstitutional delay in his indictment from his arrest on August 4, 2020 until the indictment date of December 1, 2020 violating the Sixth Amendment as codified by 18 U.S.C. 3161(b) due to the government’s failure to have a timely indictment returned within 30 days as required by 18 U.S.C. 3161(b) [DE73] in light of the order of the Supreme Court dated May 16, 2022 denying certiorari in Jeffrey Olsen v. United States, Case No. 20-50329) should the law on this point change to his benefit in the future. 3 PrefixIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 2022 DAREN RAZZ, PETITIONER, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT The Petitioner, DAREN RAZZ, respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment-order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit entered on December 28, 2022 Case No. 21-14254; Southern District of Florida Case Number 20-cr-80082-RAR-1.