Whether homeless cats and other non-property animals have rudimentary state and federal constitutional rights, rights under existing state and federal victim's rights acts, and the right to be plaintiffs in federal and state filed lawsuits

QUESTIONS PRESENTED: 1. A never before presented legal issue that per the recent Federal Animal Cruelty Law and existing State Animal Cruelty Laws, Homeless Cats and other Non-Property Animals, as indicated as petitioners, have A) Rudimentary State and Federal Constitutional Rights, B) have Rights under the existing State and Federal Victim's Right's Acts, C) and as "Stand Alone Victims" under these Animal Cruelty Laws, they 3 have the right to be "Plaintiffs" in both Federal and State filed lawsuits. 2. That the "Caretakers" of any such Non-Property Animals, or any provider of life giving assistance to these animals both during life and after death, have a Constitutional Right to bring lawsuits on their behalf. That the Courts precedent that these Animals must have the ability to obtain legal counsel and can only have counsel represent them is a violation of their Due Process Of Law and Right To Access To The Courts as victims of a clearly established law. 3. That the Federal and State's Animal Cruelty Law establishes them as "Stand Alone Victims" of clearly established criminal laws which makes Non-Property Animals a never before litigated entity that is similarly situated with human victims of other similar human laws and therefore gives them the same rights as any human victim if the laws themselves are not to be considered discriminatory. When the Federal and States passed the Animal Cruelty Laws and put them into effect they created a never before protected class of being that must be afforded all considerations of their human counter parts. An example being that if corporations can be considered entities for the purpose ___ of any lawsuit then the Federal and State Animal Cruelty Laws establishes "All" animals as an "entity" protected by law and with that must come Equal Protection Of Law. 4. That Homeless Cats and Non-Property Animals as "Stand Alone Victims" of acts of animal cruelty which the laws now prohibit for all animals must not be discriminated against by affording them less than the same protection of law as Property Animals and that the law and law enforcement must consider the infliction of cruelty on Non-Property Animals equal to that of Property Animals and must afford Non-Property Animals the same Equal Protection Of Law without discrimination. 4 5. That the Federal and State Courts are committing an act of discrimination by enforcing their religious point of view while denying US Citizens the freedom of religion to believe and act according to their religious beliefs that animals have souls th