Tamar Devell Harvey v. Frederick Russell, Assistant Warden
Punishment
Whether the district court erred in dismissing the plaintiff's claim for failure to state a claim
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED * Question + |* How can the district court say that x failed +o state a Claim @Sainct Lonners when she never said that sh@ personally handed m4 Sntvance to anyone 7 Comer Seif jt ihe forwarded a0 of me Sritvance fh ‘ secuctty +-4he inveshaatas Question 44: ere were prdon officials inside of those obhres, “The Gestion under the Eidhth Amendment is whether Conneraas a Prison officials acted with deliberate indifference 9 and exPased Harvey to 9 suffi CientY substantial ‘risk Of serious damage to his Cuture health or <afety? "I . Question +3 On Sul4 ala aor did Conner iSnore a maior risk +o Harvey™ Question 44! | \Wh3 didn’ Conner Personally hand Harvey's notice to another Pri'son officialsif she Knew that she wasn’t ding ty dake additonal achonsy ofter leaving his notees in emety offices | Question +5 * | On Sulyal or? Followind Conner's actions >was Harve) exposure to those unteasonable isk of serious bodil¥ harm unconstHetional ? a) A 5 2/6 SEE eee FPZ(E EF s EL s 2S o Cc 3° CU zal ao ® gS =F g Qsia booed go S Ar on 4° 8 8 [FEk a ee reese eg Ulk #58, AGES ° a7 geet Le toh eete ‘ ELeEE aan c § of ~~ 2 {2S ~ SPREE Oo av < S| cf oo GAs ~~ = A Wheels : R+ a 5 Ce eso e|h ease a OD te o 885° 2n<e8 Pe Resi: as Zz E& ; et 2284 . “3e8" Sa 203 a oe 5 +> gah 2 sit , + coe = & S ~> : 7 ae Na) 2s at 7—.2 © 2 8 4 ra a! S38 +? Ss : = : : Ss a + +S & 2 b > 3 m g = eg 3° sy > Eis ao ~ = aoe Ss So 78 aks qf 2 Sam S > 2 ra Sa =e 5 , ££ : +4 aw eo fk west ay + tc 83 3 he . 2 <2 e os +> a3 +? vf f a2 {2 £8 i 2 = © & 2 BE ; i : , 5 4 Aaa) Ss : 4 a == Qu a 7 re g => ® 36 VO” : : 7 7 2. 2 Ss ot > 3 eo” Sh FPS ate nS as < a = : o 8S _ 5 a QR Fs 5 a4 3 3 BS a ; a3 8 eo ® $s 7, |