No. 22-7156
James Anthony Rogers v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-violation civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection prosecutorial-misconduct
Latest Conference:
2023-04-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the prosecutor's conduct in this case violated the petitioner's due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . ue tfc Lhe fe bo « Qh y ouh cas? ; : he was Suppo bus fre tutu iu f4_© Lion § tos Th». courts Gn ft Nayar a id. 3, £ very Fyn a ho Lom 2 bach he wogld gat thing « From ProSsey tor whe f she Sard ted. ? [ros$ieu tor Says, wher Th zy aNd + 4 — te ree me : Ss. 5 t ro $1 cy Fo § g ° 22 dudd 1.9 thing sTo th « cuse widh oat vi te ma kw tae foo Ke worse. . l Aroutt Mw Duy o5 2 fe 4a m ot thet on my aS, Sat d Don ly oe i pl del mk get trap h I ee
Docket Entries
2023-04-24
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
2023-04-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-09-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 1, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent