No. 22-7161

Moses D. Estrada v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2023-03-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: access-to-courts appeal-rights appellate-procedure civil-procedure court-of-appeals due-process finality procedural-fairness time-limitation timeliness transcript-denial
Latest Conference: 2023-06-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Court of Appeals' failure to issue its order for over 11 months and then denying the appellant the opportunity to file a petition for rehearing denies the appellant due process

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . | Te Jashec served when’ the Court of appeals does not tSSue its ocder until more than eleven (il) months have passed since the motion was. submitted ~Tthen denies appellant the oppoctunity te have an application to extend hme + eubett pe tihen foc Vehearing ? 2. Is justice denied when the Court of Appeal does not allow appellant te have a copy, transeriph oc audio of Jive ocal arguments where appellant ie Wet permitted te attend 7 3. Does en extended untimely denial ef a recall remdthituc . (over elevem (I) months) imposes a due Process violaten © because i+ Is an Imped\ ment + seefing finality im ciate Courts and impedes Filins an applicaten created by state acton...?

Docket Entries

2023-06-05
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
2023-03-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 1, 2023)

Attorneys

Moses D. Estrada
Moses D. Estrada — Petitioner
Moses D. Estrada — Petitioner