whether-a-child's-familial-relationships-are-protected

QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW : 1. Whether a child’s familial relationships are protected. 2. Whether the Bill of Rights is applicable to the States. 3. Whether the district court engaged in a witch hunt in violation of M.M.B.’s and his father’s rights and liberties under the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments. 4. Wheiher the Clearly Erroneous Standard of Review is unconstitutional. 5. Whether State legislation asserting authority to alter the Constitution's guarantee of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus is unconstitutional. 6. Whether Congress’ unconstitutional alterations to the writ of habeas corpus are void. 7. Whether the Court should create new Federal Common Law establishing the standard of review ensuring that the judgments made are in the best interests of the child and that courts of review may not be immobilized by fraud upon the court. . 8. Whether the Court should vacate the Judgments and Orders and Opinions of this case in the lower courts. 9. Whether the issues of sanctions and attorney fees and costs should be remanded. 10. Whether M.M.B. is entitled to equitable relief. 11. Whether M.M.B. is entitled to the writ of habeas corpus and should be entrusted to the custody of his father. i PARTIES TO LOWER PROCEEDINGS I. Michaela Dojcinovic Bachmayer, NKA Michaela Dojcinovic, Respondent I. Kyle Dalke Bachmayer, Appellant