Whether the State of Michigan's complete failure to ensure judicial impartiality, as evidenced by the lack of procedure to address allegations of judicial bias, violates the Due Process Clause and creates a state bar to the federal courts' ability to protect substantive rights?

No question identified. : 7 _ PREWAR? QUESTLAUS OV CERTEILAIRT EE Bhrethen iy, BeryasO Prepaty 6OcCCe? burltia Ww the Hate vepartig bene — bboy aituee tion , Atiqant 2 Perception . OP pathially o€ ay “eitity resus a upagen" ? Lack e€ pucedure ibsue_ TE, Unethes a Gutabuses hsevetyn ube itavls Ye conseter streterfal, pungllitine, : andlor vetveactile Cabelaur tMyyes¢h led wiatters , vert Mrorlgh beub dh tye lifcathin Le also Gtekyal oh nature? Reerl ($5é : TE. theren the Hale's complete Mabry _ te engure julliedal imps Mek lke, ae vole vel te ouch As gual Gratin, cveates a Mate bar we hue Pyrxees Protect Subilantie _ viyls, rhird vegulves qvant ob the primary matter Chene a mer @-$ea) ? “Rule HOA), See Ypperdic n\ Cor detals. : | @ e hirbab duties, Rule HOI . Tae Peaple o€ en Ftabe of a cue Keut Conky Prsecutny OF6te Ate dt Lhe Darke,” WW Chwistepher Beer. OAT OG HOWEVER , Hre (Ace? 1b Subet to Abpuel Grete Lor Maan bereet Wn trecsiwy leach shila velahel” te the Oll3os Cell AquG Twete C2) ages are Still witgeng and wnatoungel tr 7 Me Dekute by 4th rhe Court Sealed’ the copy _ mete tx’ Yrseiyter Brlnbrrau, 442. rns constitutes peswawent pwe7ydkike , o~¢~(oe?. a ASP, the State Jtsel€ us @ muve leg tbel partgLact ofa Stave pyreed ure rer beirc& Si etrati 1 a state, not @ county i Ie oe Bul, the Mddbué Atemes Beuctel has < emeltt The nurscgen Eon cit term Eu tegvty we Unt 15 nally the dnncwie venmrel a a Wirtngan MO CWKE Ary preet_ COMBERUENLY, Me Mrbygan cunts ave the only actual 4 partes “ “psi laeinrch thegee(i— — ASUPCHA) too themcetees arid ~wocedure( bbe precess proteriy sublstag tive pats, bet of Wwe judieleny, Frey Cannot oppose Vogel prceg, oe This cveates Wheat ue a Uneaten o€ Eve t Um pre4$ien = Vows ne oppesing ents / TAs uve stioulk ae gvante?, the lack ofan oPpeslrg parts year nces Wr, Baesiiard 's rg _ Lo praceclinn Cue V8 C65, and bol 45 hate ¥ See Motion #5 ne | Prviveclhigs Oiveotty Rel, To 7h ex Cour Rule (40 )\baNXv ry . Lt) ety CYeult Got , OU AEE LC fromeli led Murd A ; Au ya POEs, wa A) Bik DBL GurtsbiAye[s Ws, MATS, | | Oileet Aypecl, Pebncary, '§ pw E, ROE Mirth, AypLEXES 3G. } C3) MI 9-4.) HE Wh, 972, $C 133521, Dee? Aypeal, Ctkvboep PA PIE (1) U9. 9-Ct) 533 U5, (Es, UME oe Consens” ty Cot of Aypals dered, Magy 14, 2 : (VME sit, 196 Wert, V9 (Dee. 3, Pete) , Dime! bE LNeE Me? OSB2 _ yA (4) U5. 6.bt, 0% 4069 , Cell Aah Uvri't bene a. CE) Bend Desgaali Qian (See Ayop todtetet &6 -c)+ — (rt Ciieeut , o4-on'tEE~Ec (2029-29 £2) _ Court o& Ayptals ) 1/0.35F494 CA2872) ME Supreme Gunte, A log gtl (Ota eF2), COlOXH 72) i L o'%t-4C4, $5346 O55 (vad 14) Awe), petition for Lt eb CuhWan, to venga Cutt OC ee Weypeals Laued? cat Aart, _ TABLE OF CWTEVTS, RULE (Hae) . . Pedmary Guertin On Coepbbypeth ———<—~—~— ; ish et Danses, Aule 1¢ UC o) Oy) a precec dags Dwvectty Relate? To The Case oe En TAB Bert, 140. dU) Tudler e€ Muh tres , Rule 140%) — Append tt CS . Oypadarens , Rule (40) Cad) npr mY emsiytuteinal oul Steletory DOLHME, fi Rule ic\Ce) a . LO Granth Coton, La Tudsti'al . “Duby ubel i cate vt Cases ae . 4,0 Cucbe Hateuvent 66 the Beuch Ddqudihiratim Tssue, Rule 44g) -—_ 12 | LA Threstelé Matfers (Category I Auestins) — 20 A, TSgue of Meet tht Geta l runoeence . As A hWeshllL Logue, Rule AIG)la) -— 43 9.0 Ayvgumeut litgchg R S elie) au For Tlectce CESARE NE) 200 St Reasons Far Giarhiy the Delrin ——46 3.2 Mule 1?Cb), Chavecter of Reasons ¢Cmk jit 32 4,3, Reale ie), Clhavecter o€ Avasgons « a uUnsetted law” —-~-—-—-___—_ 3K ; B4 Reason: Mbseuce of Mebigan Prwcess — 33 . . YY TABLE OF COMTEWVTS (owt) 3.5 Reason’ Handa’ For Ae-=stalelshva cut 0 Presam pty af mpatrality Ounce 7 Cra lbteag.€) nnn ; 3.6 REA : 0isgue lYG'cahom Is “Un Lived! "93 To Grounds } Subfeet Te £tasrable Cy Y'2zen Peracertims —— 36 3,2 Qwagsans Mithizan'’ Lack of Hawtlrls3F 3.9 Reasom + Hancbard For Detesmdir¢ peer GIy BF , 2,4 Reasons penerplion ab Auvialety —— Ho 3.19 Rease + Reagmel’ Cpinims —_ | 3. Reason? Tnegucralency Bete wer 4:00? Onl Bo