Is the decision of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold the lower court's decision remain a decision that contradicts the judicial oath of fairness that judges are sworn to uphold?

Does the district court's decision show bias unfair treatment based upon the choices the judge had before her and the fact that the defense didn't follow the LCvR56 either?

Is the main fact of the defense able to withstand in the court of law?

Has the plaintiff provided supportive undisputable evidence beyond 50% preponderance that F&S indeed terminated his employment wrongfully which has violated his ADA/ADAA right as a matter of law.

Is the decision of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold the lower court's decision remain a decision that contradicts the judicial oath of fairness that judges are sworn to uphold?