Did the North Carolina State Superior Court deny this Petitioner actual justice in the face of established 'State laws allowing the filing of a second Motion For Appropriate Relief (MAR), demonstrating violations of Petitioners Constitutional Rights to a fair and impartial trial?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , 1. Did the North Carolina State Superior Court deny this Petitioner actual justice in the face of established ‘State laws allowing the filing of a second Motion For Appropriate Relief (MAR), demonstrating violations of Petitioners Constitutional Rights to a fair and impartial trial? 2. Can the protections afforded and guaranteed by Petitioner's United States Constitutional Rights to the effective assistance of counsel be omitted and disregarded by the lower State Court in essence to state laws that should be voided for vagueness? : i .