No. 22-7181
Kerrin Ann Barrett v. PAE, Incorporated
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-timeline civil-rights claim-preclusion due-process federal-statutes judicial-expediency res-judicata whistleblower whistleblower-statutes
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-06-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether applying res judicata doctrine to deny separate and distinct claims under Federal whistleblower statutes, including those that have specific administrative timelines, violates the Due Process Clause?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED , Whether applying res judicata doctrine to deny separate and distinct claims : under Federal whistleblower statutes, including those that have specific administrative timelines, violates the Due Process Clause? . : , > . . P il
Docket Entries
2023-06-12
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-05
Waiver of right of respondent PAE, Incorporated to respond filed.
2023-05-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-19
Petitioner complied with order of May 1, 2023.
2023-05-01
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until May 22, 2023, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2023-04-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
2023-04-05
Waiver of right of respondent PAE, Incorporated to respond filed.
2023-03-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 3, 2023)
Attorneys
Kerrin A. Barrett
Kerrin Barrett — Petitioner
PAE, Incorporated
Dylan Bradley Carp — Jackson Lewis LLP, Respondent