No. 22-7182
Azizjon Rakhmatov v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-46c 2nd-circuit circuit-conflict criminal-procedure due-process en-banc en-banc-review inter-panel-conflict judicial-bias racial-bias sentencing
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities Privacy
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities Privacy
Latest Conference:
2023-05-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 28 U.S.C. §46c and due process require en banc consideration of inter-panel conflict
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Questions Presented 1. Whether the unresolved conflict between the Second Circuit panels in this case, and the conflict among the circuits on whether 28 U.S.C. §46c and due process require en banc consideration of inter-panel conflict, merits this Court’s resolution? 2. Whether due process and Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure require that a District Court, who finalizes a sentence only by post-hearing written memorandum, to entertain a post-memorandum motion and to correct a clearly erroneous sentence, based on racial, ethnic and religious bias? 1
Docket Entries
2023-05-15
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-04-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-03-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 3, 2023)
Attorneys
Azizjon Rakhmatov
Lawrence Stern — Law Office of Lawrence Mark Stern, Petitioner
Lawrence Stern — Law Office of Lawrence Mark Stern, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent