Was petitioner prejudiced when the South Carolina Supreme Court denied his writ of certiorari on oral arguments

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 1.Was petitioner Prejudiced when the South carolina Supreme denied his Writ of Certiorari on Oral arguments,and in a violatio® of the 6th and 14th Amendments to the United States Supreme Court : that guarantees a defendant a fair trial by a panel of impartial and indifferent Jurors,when the U.S. Supreme Court as already Stated in Remmer vs. U.S. ; and Williams Vs. Taylor;in cases where a juror's impartiality is questioned after trial,it is _ appropriate to-conduct a hearing in which the defendant has the opportunity to prove actual Juror Bias,therefore the Petitioner Constitutional Rights to a fair and impartial Juror's in a violation of Clearly established Federal law and 6th and 14th Amendments to the United states Constitution and a "REMMER_ = __ ~ HEARING" should be granted and this Case remanded back to the . South Carolina supreme Court and/or Trial Coutt for an Evidentiary Hearing that was Denied. 2.Was Petitioner entitled to a hearing on the Merits on an Evidentiary Hearing under the Cause and Prejudice,where the Judge was repremanded for Judicial Misconduct and the South Carolina Supreme Court Erred when they stated that they couldn't come up with an opinion and relied on the S.C. Court of Appeals denial when the record is clear with multiple affidavits to warrant an evidentiary hearing pursuant to clearly established Federal law See;Remmer vs. U.S.347 U.S. 227 (1954) ;Williams Vs. Taylor ,529 U.S. 420 (2000);and the 6th, and 14th Amendment to the Umited states;supreme Court Precidents Warrant a Hearing. t, of 2, QUESTIONS) PRESENTED 5) DIA the South Covoling Suppeme Conat of lact redat Cvtoy by Dismissing ag Tmpeovideoty Graste? of an '™ Powtant Feder | Peston ty a Wey that “tena Conflicts said al) decisinns ty Boh sotben Ciacutts And Clesaly Esta blisheS Fedewal | a., iM Remmeg “8 US Syn 44) Willa, V8. TAG lng, supea and ts PRcpeeas Awe Mot eroweres Raag Pon Peles wee And derieQ hi, Ri cht fo a@ fase TRr al By Awd) impaet a | Jey Presunvt Yo ve OF IB Ameukmrectn the US Cousin | PI the Soule Caceline Soppane Covet hel tenga, Dismi soo as we Pou dete geanteS of tHe ho Portas D<estow of Fedeaul LV, that hac pot been, but Should be, Settled " Thi < Court, of whethee oe not he Shnd2 ke GerawteD An Evidethap hearelog in) the Tr} a| Corerofof EV Dence of Goer. Bias of Jueon +t 14 M4tiss 4 Coo pen whew She foiled to espe NNeadlr a ite Fenilinn and) Basiacer Pelion hip