No. 22-7198

Richard Roy Blake v. Liliane Hong, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-04-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process equal-protection first-amendment fourteenth-amendment free-assembly free-speech municipal-ordinance section-1983 void-for-vagueness
Key Terms:
DueProcess FirstAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-06-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the City of Northglenn, Colorado police department violate Petitioner's First Amendment rights to free-speech, free-assembly, 42-usc-1983

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1.) Did the City of Northglenn, Colorado police department violate Petitioner’s First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly on January 4, 2020 “under color of law” in violation of 42 US Code Section 1983 when they issued him a ticket and threatened him with arrest while he was engaged in a peaceful protest on the sidewalk adjacent to the Metropolitan Denver North Islamic Center? 2.) Did the City of Northglenn repeatedly violate Petitioner’s 14th Amendment rights to due process and equal protection in prosecuting him under Northglenn ordinance 9-11, 16.5, arguing that instead of being an American citizen with Constitutional rights, (or even a human being) he was, in fact, an object obstructing a city thoroughfare. 3.) Is Northglenn Municipal Code 9-11,16.5 void for vagueness under 14th Amendment and overbroad under the First Amendment? i

Docket Entries

2023-06-05
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
2023-03-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 4, 2023)

Attorneys

Richard Roy Blake
Richard Roy Blake — Petitioner
Richard Roy Blake — Petitioner