No. 22-72
Jerald Hammann v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure constitutional-rights dismissal-with-prejudice due-process judicial-procedure law-of-case law-of-the-case lower-court-jurisdiction rule-60.02
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a lower court is obligated to abide by the law of the case even if it claims the appellate court erred
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is whether a lower court is obligated to abide by the law of the case even if it claims the appellate court erred. The second question presented is whether a dismissal with prejudice jurisdictionally precludes a district court from hearing a motion to vacate judgment filed pursuant to Rule 60.02. The third question presented is whether the appellate court erred in dismissing the appeal. , The fourth question presented is whether existing judicial procedures are adequate to protect individual constitutional rights.
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-29
Waiver of right of respondent Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to respond filed.
2021-09-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 25, 2022)
Attorneys
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Kristina H. Kaluza — Dykema Gossett, PLLC, Respondent
Kristina H. Kaluza — Dykema Gossett, PLLC, Respondent