No. 22-7210
David McCall, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3582 circuit-split criminal-procedure district-court-discretion extraordinary-compelling-reason sentence-reduction sentencing-law
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-05-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-district-court-may-consider-sentencing-disparity
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a district court may consider the disparity in a sentence when the applicable sentencing law has changed, when the disparity is of a degree which reflects an extraordinary and compelling reason for a reduction in sentence under 18 U.SC. §3582(c)(1)(A). i
Docket Entries
2023-05-22
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
2023-05-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-03-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 5, 2023)
Attorneys
David McCall, Jr.
Vanessa Faye Malone — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Vanessa Faye Malone — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent