Whether the court erred in dismissing a pro se petition asserting a plausible claim of actual innocence without requiring a response from the state and without considering the 'ends of justice' or 'equitable tolling' exceptions to the statute of limitations defense

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Weg nate AWA Unronsbitehannal Rachets by Fan ling da Ccosecuds £ 2asy Pebbon Asercting Plausible Claim oF Actual Inno Cenet-Pre-Aeped, For Fat ling ty Pay the 85.00, Fi ling Fee wodbin a Four Day heciod? luhedher this Achon Concerned the Arelicehon And Adkectncte To Fed. Aole of Civil Gocedurt} Lithether wisteyet Court treseded it chicccehon ’ In Ret Lonadering tht “Enda oF duehe” or “Bqirbedle disees4ton are es In Hr Miseacciage of tusten tuetrehon lorborte Dis Massing & aasy Pebhon Lith etn Le Dist at Couct Syertded is discrehon Lihin id diswiissed 3 AASY based an Sue Srontt atdute ef himibshon Defense ustbout Requiring a Resfenss. From tre Stites of Florida, And Uhedrsr Sueb secon Was Prttudiet al in Relieving , Party Im DePosthon of its bucden +o Resrera to 3 2254 Pebheon