1. Did thetrial Court Err in allowing
oncharged erimes
not containod in the in farmatuen, to he introduced and
sfotlighted as testimany? As well as beong brooght up
again during Closing arguments?

2.Werethe prosecuter's improper closins arguments
impermissable,and did they shift the burden of proot
to the petrtioner?

3.Did the tr.al Judye abuse his discretoan when he dened
three cause challenses,which all had sisnficant reusmable
doubt as to jorer impartrality

4. Was the Sentence Vindictne beause the petrtrner went to
&months in cennty was cffered, fellowed by a"pleaas. charged?

I. Should an instructron to inctude alesser charge huve
been included?

Shofring Comment, did it umaunt in a fundamental errer,
intringing on the petrtoner's right to a fair and inpartial

Whether the trial court erred in allowing certain evidence to be introduced and considered as testimony, as well as issues brought up during closing arguments